Speaker summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Cilimburg results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 55.747 hits . Analysis detected 243.6 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (24,798 of 39,234 speakers). This Amy Cilimburg is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Amy Cilimburg
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.8% percentile 21.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos111 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 46.5% 46.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 23.1% 23.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 31.2% 31.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 23.1% 23.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 21.5% 21.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 23.1% 23.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst