Speaker summary
77%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allen Hall results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 52.875 hits. Analysis detected 293.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (7,213 of 28,364 speakers). This Allen Hall is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Allen Hall
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos