Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video228 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alister Martin, MD results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 199 faulty-reasoning hits from 228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (19,586 of 26,806 speakers). This Alister Martin, MD is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Alister Martin, MD
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠27%Alister Martin, MD (selected)18%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 228
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.9% percentile
17.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos228 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.4%18.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos