Speaker summary
⁠59%2 analyzed articles/videos302.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alisha Sonnier results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, False Dilemma, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 947.549 faulty-reasoning hits from 302.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (23,747 of 27,841 speakers). This Alisha Sonnier is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group.
Alisha Sonnier
Speaker details
Total words: 302.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510014.7% percentile
11.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos302.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.1%18.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos