Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video33.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexis Charalampakis results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 86% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 211.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 33.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,304 of 28,364 speakers). This Alexis Charalampakis is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Alexis Charalampakis
Speaker details
Total words: 33.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos33.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 86.0%86.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 72.0%72.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 64.0%64.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 54.0%54.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 54.0%54.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 64.0%64.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 36.0%36.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 86.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 72.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 64.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 64.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 54.0%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 54.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos