Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexei Gippius results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Overconfidence Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 161 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,354 of 28,364 speakers). This Alexei Gippius is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Alexei Gippius
Speaker details
Total words: 96
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.4% percentile
31.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos96 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 24.2%24.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos