Speaker summary
⁠78%3 analyzed articles/videos188.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Stack results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 787.799 faulty-reasoning hits from 188.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,709 of 28,364 speakers). This Alex Stack is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Alex Stack
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.0% percentile
17.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos188.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.0%28.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.1%14.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.6%28.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 2.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos