Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video148.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Farrell results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 43.2% saturation with 64.125 hits. Analysis detected 225.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 148.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,836 of 28,364 speakers). This Alex Farrell is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Alex Farrell
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 148.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.2% percentile
33.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos148.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.8%28.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos