Speaker summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 244.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Carolla results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 128.431 hits . Analysis detected 1,064.834 faulty-reasoning hits from 244.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (21,404 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Carolla is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Adam Carolla
Speaker details
Total words: 244.333
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.5% percentile 16.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos244.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 52.6% 52.6% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 30.5% 30.5% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 25.9% 25.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 28.9% 28.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 19.7% 19.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 20.8% 20.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 25.1% 25.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 52.6%, sitewide 8.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 5.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 0.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 9.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 6.9% Straw Man: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.4% No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst