Speaker summary
82%2 analyzed articles/videos244.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Carolla results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 128.431 hits. Analysis detected 1,064.834 faulty-reasoning hits from 244.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (21,404 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Carolla is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Adam Carolla
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 244.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.5% percentile
16.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos244.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 52.6%52.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 30.5%30.5%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 25.9%25.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 25.1%25.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 52.6%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 0.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.4%No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos