Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abbe Lowell results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 81.9% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 159.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,893 of 28,364 speakers). This Abbe Lowell is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Abbe Lowell
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
36.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 81.9%81.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 47.9%47.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.1%18.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.1%18.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 81.9%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 47.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos