Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AARP results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 103 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 88.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,895 of 28,364 speakers). This AARP is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
AARP
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.7% percentile
88.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 77.6%77.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 77.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos