Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video49.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Weiss results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 55.5 hits. Analysis detected 275.958 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 79.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,190 of 28,364 speakers). This Aaron Weiss is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Aaron Weiss
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 49.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.7% percentile
79.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos