Publication summary
35% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,707 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The 74 results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 1,332 hits . Analysis detected 8,195 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,738 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (456 of 568 publications). This The 74 is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 24,738
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.8% percentile 0.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles24.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst