Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Giana Loretta results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 252 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,078 authors). This Giana Loretta is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Giana Loretta
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Giana Loretta (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,556
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos