Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chris Cerf results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 848 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,166 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,075 authors). This Chris Cerf is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chris Cerf
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Chris Cerf (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,166
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 2.6%2.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Straw Man: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos