Publication summary
67% 19 analyzed articles/videos 13,620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Streetsblog NYC results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 4,213 hits . Analysis detected 37,937 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,449 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 39% (345 of 564 publications). This Streetsblog NYC is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 57,449
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.9% percentile 1.3% BS Score19 analyzed articles57.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst