Author summary
41% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Smith results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 873 hits . Analysis detected 3,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,468 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,909 of 8,910 authors). This Emily Smith is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Emily Smith
Author details
Total words: 6,468
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Horn Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst