Julie Menin is Weighing At Least 17 E-Bike and E-Moto Bills  Here’s What We Know 5%

By Emily Smith

8/5/2026, 9:05:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Red Herring, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 356 faulty-reasoning hits from 718 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of 5% (26,708 of 28,112 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the article peer group.

City Council Speaker Julie Menin is throwing the book at the “e-bike” debate and considering no less than 17 bills related to e-micromobility regulation at a marquee hearing scheduled for late September. 
At a press conference on Tuesday announcing the new bills, Menin claimed that her “comprehensive legislative review” was “not about blaming any one party,” but none of the bills directly address reckless car and truck drivers, who cause the majority of e-bike-involved crashes and kill or injure thousands of New Yorkers each year. 
Menin’s office has said all 17 bills are on the table, and that the hearing’s goal is to “identify effective legislative solutions” from among them. 
So far, Menin and her office have explicitly identified just 10 existing bills, while teasing another six. 
The Sept. 30 hearing is a long way’s away, and Menin has suggested the number of bills could still grow. 
For now, here’s a list of the e-bike and e-moto bills on Speaker Menin and her Council colleagues have prepared for their proverbial legislative table: 
Speaker Julie Menin on her X account, detailing the announcement of the new bills. 
Intro 950 , sponsored by Council Member Lynn Schulman (D-Forest Hills), requires delivery services to get a business license from the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection. 
Intro 244 , sponsored by Council Member Crystal Hudson (D-Crown Heights), prohibits the sale and rental of class 3 e-bikes  which can go up to 25 miles per hour and sometimes have a throttle. 
Hudson first introduced this bill last year with the support of 24 co-sponsors and the biking and walking advocacy group Transportation Alternatives. 
Intro 124 from Council Member Selvena Brooks-Power would establish a task force to investigate how to make street designs and infrastructure safer for all motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. 
Brooks-Powers (D-Laurelton) proposed several task forces and new reporting requirement during her time chairing the Council Transportation Committee under former Speaker Adrienne Adams  while opposing bike lanes in her own district. 
Also sponsored by Brooks-Powers is Intro 110 , which expands the city’s commercial bike safety laws by requiring businesses to keep records of their delivery workers and provide them with safety equipment, information and identification. 
A third bill sponsored by Brooks-Powers, Intro 787 , would require the NYPD to publicly report where it conducted “targeted” traffic enforcement , including information regarding where targets were located and specific instances of e-scooter or e-bike related enforcement. 
Another bill, Intro 389 , introduced by Lincoln Restler (D-Boerum Hill), requires all third-party food delivery services to make sure that the mopeds used by workers are properly registered with the state Department of Motor Vehicles. 
Sponsored by Council Member Gale Brewer (D-Upper West Side), Intro 78 , would require third-party apps to disclose driver data , including ID numbers and delivery time and location. 
“That information will help the city identify where infrastructure investments are needed, where they’re needed most,” said Brewer. 
Intro 95 , also from Brewer, calls for the distribution of materials detailing the proper operation of mopeds through a coordinated effort between DCWP and the Department of Transportation. 
It would require moped sellers to provide these materials upon the sale of a moped. 
Menin also touted two resolutions from Brewer and one more on the way: The first, Resolution 44 , calls on the State Legislature to increase the penalty for e-scooter drivers who leave the scene of a crash without reporting it and create a penalty for e-bikers who do the same. 
The second, Resolution 43 , calls on the state to pass a registration program for commercial e-bike delivery vehicles . 
Crucially, Brewer will also introduce a resolution calling on the state to pass a registration and licensing program for all e-bike riders , a Council spokesman said on Tuesday. 
(Mayor Mamdani reiterated his opposition to that idea on Wednesday.) 
The pro-licensing and registration resolution is one of several Menin and her allies have merely teased, including: 
“additional insurance requirements for third-party delivery applications” 
“trade-in incentives for unsafe devices” 
“stronger consumer protections” 
“expanded enforcement” 
and “infrastructure changes to slow high-speed rolling” 
We will continue to update this story as Menin and the Council publish more of the (allegedly) 17 bills and counting. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 1.6%Streetsblog NYC: 3.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Emily Smith: 0.3%Streetsblog NYC: 0.8%Anchoring Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 3.7%Streetsblog NYC: 4.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.6%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Emily Smith: 1.9%Streetsblog NYC: 4.7%Framing Effect7.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.7%Streetsblog NYC: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 2.4%Streetsblog NYC: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 3.5%Streetsblog NYC: 4.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.4%Streetsblog NYC: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Emily Smith: 13.5%Streetsblog NYC: 7.3%Negativity Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.8%Streetsblog NYC: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.3%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Emily Smith: 1.3%Streetsblog NYC: 0.8%Recency Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.3%Streetsblog NYC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Emily Smith: 0.5%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Ad Hominem4.5%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 1.2%Streetsblog NYC: 2.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 1.3%Streetsblog NYC: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.9%Emily Smith: 3.6%Streetsblog NYC: 5.3%Hasty Generalization2.9%This article: 7.4%Emily Smith: 1.2%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Red Herring7.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 2.4%Streetsblog NYC: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.7%Streetsblog NYC: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 4.7%Streetsblog NYC: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 1.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 14.8%Emily Smith: 5.6%Streetsblog NYC: 5.9%Biased Writer Voice14.8%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.2%Streetsblog NYC: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Smith: 0.4%Streetsblog NYC: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

718 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.5%attributed speech700writer words
Selected voice

Gale Brewer

0%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words100% of attributed speech18% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.1 ptsWriter: 15.1%Gale Brewer: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.