Keyword summary
59%3 analyzed articles/videos1,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Micromobility results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 568 hits. Analysis detected 4,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,828 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 36% (35,320 of 54,697 keywords). This Micromobility is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Micromobility
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
36%Micromobility (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,828
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate