Author summary
61% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophia Lebowitz results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,091 hits . Analysis detected 6,559 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,262 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (5,770 of 8,954 authors). This Sophia Lebowitz is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group. Sophia Lebowitz
Author details
Total words: 9,262
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst