Publication summary
63% 15 analyzed articles/videos 1,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Next City results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,011 hits . Analysis detected 6,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,832 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 66% (195 of 557 publications). This Next City is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 7,832
Article count: 15
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score15 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 12.9% 12.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Publication 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 11.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst