BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 86.8% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 381 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (7,091 of 28,109 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the article peer group.

Our coverage examines how policies under U.S. 
President Donald Trump  both in his first term and current administration  are reshaping American cities. 
From cuts to housing, environmental justice and worker protections to rollbacks of diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, Trump-era decisions will have lasting consequences for women, immigrants and communities of color. 
This reporting tracks the impacts on cities, the resistance they’ve sparked, and the local movements building more equitable alternatives. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.4%Next City: 2.2%Confirmation Bias22.4%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Next City: 2.6%Availability Heuristic9.2%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 86.8%Next City: 12.9%Framing Effect86.8%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 25.0%Next City: 1.0%Status Quo Bias25.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 4.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 39.5%Next City: 1.2%Pessimism Bias39.5%This article: 64.5%Next City: 5.7%Negativity Bias64.5%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 39.5%Next City: 0.9%In-Group Bias39.5%This article: 39.5%Next City: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias39.5%This article: 0.0%Next City: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 1.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 39.5%Next City: 0.9%Slippery Slope39.5%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 39.5%Next City: 5.9%Hasty Generalization39.5%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 3.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 22.4%Next City: 1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)22.4%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 1.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 48.7%Next City: 9.7%Biased Writer Voice48.7%This article: 25.0%Next City: 5.1%Indoctrination25.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 11.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Next City: 2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

76 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.