Keyword summary
39% 11 analyzed articles/videos 8,791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cities results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 6,314 hits . Analysis detected 54,475 faulty-reasoning hits from 74,302 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (33,233 of 35,318 keywords). This Cities is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Cities
Keyword details
Total words: 74,302
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles74.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst