Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Pitta results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 1,932 hits . Analysis detected 10,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,922 of 6,364 authors). This Julie Pitta is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group. Julie Pitta
Author details
Total words: 8,908
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.7% 21.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.8% 16.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst