Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Clean Energy Wire results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,654 hits . Analysis detected 8,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,233 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Clean Energy Wire is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Clean Energy Wire
Author details
Total words: 13,233
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst