Topic summary
62%4 analyzed articles/videos1,933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These E Bikes results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 2,025 hits. Analysis detected 14,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,713 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (11,246 of 16,562 topics). This E Bikes is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
E Bikes
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate