Publication summary
78% 11 analyzed articles/videos 13,837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ScheerPost results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 7,531 hits . Analysis detected 59,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 64,176 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (236 of 541 publications). This ScheerPost is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 64,176
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles64.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst