Author summary
59%1 analyzed article/video2,174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alan Macleod results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 1,498 hits. Analysis detected 8,339 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,181 of 8,233 authors). This Alan Macleod is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Alan Macleod
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
0%Cleveland Documenters1%
0%T. Christian Miller1%
62%Alan Macleod (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,696
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.2%17.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos