Author summary
ā 86% 1 analyzed article/video 1,723 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vijay Prashad results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,163 hits . Analysis detected 6,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ā 66% (2,834 of 8,233 authors). This Vijay Prashad is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Vijay Prashad
Author details
Total words: 6,892
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.6% 10.6% Politically Left Leaning ā¦ Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.5% 9.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst