Publication summary
35% 14 analyzed articles/videos 8,646 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nashville Scene results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 3,348 hits . Analysis detected 22,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,204 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (390 of 556 publications). This Nashville Scene is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 44,204
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.9% percentile 1.1% BS Score14 analyzed articles44.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst