Girl Tones Brings the Bowling Green Scene to Music City 3%

By Julianne Akers42%

8/5/2026, 3:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hindsight Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 693 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (26,827 of 27,493 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the article peer group.

It’s not often that you’ll find sisters Laila Crowe and Kenzie Shultz flailing around a moshpit. 
Why? 
Because they’re usually the musicians onstage commanding the sweaty crowd of headbangers. 
This is what Crowe and Shultz  the duo behind the Bowling Green, Ky.-born rock outfit Girl Tones  tell me on a sweltering summer day, sitting on the patio at The Basement ahead of a show. 
Full of energy and feminine rage, Girl Tones have gained momentum in recent years with their punk- and riot-grrrl-influenced performances. 
They’ve toured with fellow Bowling Green indie rockers Cage the Elephant as well as The Velveteers, Dexter and the Moonrocks, hey, nothing and Silversun Pickups. 
With Crowe primarily on drums and Shultz on guitar and lead vocals, the pair knows how to electrify a crowd. 
Often dressed in colorful tights and Doc Martens loafers, with a certain twee-meets-1960s je ne sais quoi to their stage fashion, the sisters have developed a distinctive, noisy and delightful unruly rock sound that refuses to hold back. 
Though they trained in classical cello and piano, the pair formed Girl Tones in 2018 amid a small yet bustling music scene in their hometown, which had a significant impact on their early years. 
“We definitely cut our teeth in Kentucky, in Bowling Green specifically,” Crowe says, adding that they got their start playing house shows and DIY gigs, sometimes traveling a couple hours away to Somerset, Ky., for a show. 
They also played many sets at the bygone Bowling Green venue Tidball’s. 
“It was a really good scene. 
And then COVID came and it kind of killed all the momentum, which was really sad, but it definitely taught us a lot.” 
The two draw inspiration from standout rockers like The White Stripes, The Kills, Queens of the Stone Age, Beck and Red Hot Chili Peppers  whose records were all frequently played around their house growing up. 
Their sibling dynamic helps them mesh well together, particularly when they’re onstage. 
“We’re used to arguing with each other and getting over it and getting resolutions out of it  because at the end of the day, I mean, we’re family, so that trumps everything,” Crowe says. 
“There’s not a ton of creative conflict, and we usually have good unspoken communication, especially with live shows. 
And I feel like that’s what makes it flow so well. 
 We’re just in tune with each other without having to necessarily say it and lay out, ‘Oh we’re gonna do this at this point.’ 
We just know.” 
This extends to their songwriting too. 
Crowe says they often (ahem) drum up their best new material when they’re supposed to be practicing their existing songs. 
“We just end up messing around because we both hate practicing,” Crowe says. 
“So then we just procrastinate while we’re down there. 
And then that’s when you come up with new stuff  and then you eventually don’t want to play that because you don’t want to practice. 
It’s just a never-ending cycle.” 
While Girl Tones have become known for their heavier rock sound, Shultz explains they don’t want to be confined to just one genre. 
“I would say ultimately we are a rock band,” says Shultz. 
“But we also want the freedom to explore and do what we want to do. 
So a general kind of umbrella term is rock, but overall we have acoustic stuff. 
We have a song that is a piano ballad, and I just feel like we’re diverse under that umbrella of rock.” 
The pair will take the stage at East Nashville’s Tomato Art Fest on Friday, Aug. 7, for what will be their fourth performance in Middle Tennessee this year, including a Bonnaroo set that got cut off early due to an unrelenting downpour. 
So far, all of the duo’s released discography includes singles like the most recent release “Stubborn Mouth” from May, along with their 2025 debut EP, <em>Blame</em> (produced by Cage the Elephant’s Brad Shultz). 
However, they’re planning to release their debut album later this year. 
“It’s sooner than you think,” Kenzie Shultz says. 
“Let’s just say that.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.8%Nashville Scene: 1.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 2.3%Nashville Scene: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Julianne Akers: 5.1%Nashville Scene: 2.2%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.9%Nashville Scene: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.3%Julianne Akers: 0.4%Nashville Scene: 0.6%Hindsight Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 5.6%Nashville Scene: 3.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.5%Nashville Scene: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Julianne Akers: 0.6%Nashville Scene: 2.4%Optimism Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.2%Nashville Scene: 0.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 1.7%Nashville Scene: 3.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 1.0%Nashville Scene: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Julianne Akers: 4.2%Nashville Scene: 3.4%Halo Effect8.4%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.5%Nashville Scene: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.5%Nashville Scene: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 1.7%Nashville Scene: 1.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.8%Nashville Scene: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 1.7%Nashville Scene: 4.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.8%Nashville Scene: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.6%Nashville Scene: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 2.9%Nashville Scene: 1.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.8%Nashville Scene: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 7.3%Nashville Scene: 7.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne Akers: 0.6%Nashville Scene: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

693 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers41%attributed speech408writer words
Selected voice

Laila Crowe

11%flagged-word coverage
211 attributed words74% of attributed speech26% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.