Dueling Polls Show Rose Closing In on Blackburn 44%

By Sarah Grace Taylor57% Nashville Banner57%

7/31/2026, 4:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 1,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 916 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (15,469 of 27,494 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the article peer group.

This story is a partnership between the Nashville Banner and the Nashville Scene. 
The Nashville Banner is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization focused on civic news. 
Visit nashvillebanner.com for more information. 
U.S. 
Sen. 
Marsha Blackburn has led the Republican race for governor of Tennessee since she threw her hat in the ring last year, but that margin is shrinking, according to new polls. 
A new poll by OnMessage Wednesday showed Blackburn’s lead at fewer than 4 percentage points, with U.S. 
Rep. 
John Rose in second, and state Rep. 
Monty Fritts (R-Kingston) fewer than 6 points behind Rose. 
While Blackburn’s campaign dismissed the poll  by far the closest poll published during the race  even conflicting numbers are indicative of a closer but still Blackburn-led race. 
The poll of 800 likely Republican primary voters conducted last week asked who respondents would support, showing Blackburn on top with 34.5 percent planning or leaning toward voting for her, followed by Rose with 31 percent, Fritts with 25.6 and 9 percent of respondents saying they were undecided. 
Blackburn has led the pack all year, with polls showing her anywhere from 15 to 60 percentage points ahead, but her lead has declined in recent weeks as Rose poured millions of his own dollars into advertising and after an awkward television interview and a lack of public debate drew scrutiny of Blackburn. 
While Rose’s campaign says it did not commission the poll, it was conducted by OnMessage, a national conservative consulting firm that has done work for Rose. 
Wes Anderson, who ran the poll, tells the Nashville Banner it was conducted at the behest of a corporate client in Tennessee and not the Rose campaign, though he would not disclose the company and acknowledges that his partner Brad Todd  an OnMessage consultant who also worked on the state’s congressional redistricting this summer  was working with Rose. 
Anderson also did polling for Rose in 2018. 
“It’s a jump ball, it’s anyone’s race,” Anderson tells the Banner, adding that he wouldn’t “put any money” on either candidate winning. 
Anderson attributes the narrowing gap to Blackburn’s declining favor among Tennessee Republicans. 
The poll also indicates Blackburn is the best-known but most divisive candidate in the field, with 47 percent favorability among the likely voters, and 50 percent viewing her unfavorably. 
Forty-five percent of respondents view Rose favorably, and 31 percent view him unfavorably. 
Fritts lacked name recognition, with 33 percent viewing him favorably and 16 percent unfavorably. 
Blackburn’s campaign rebuffs the numbers, saying it had received polling Wednesday morning reflecting 850 responses from this week that was greater than 15 points off of the new OnMessage poll, showing Blackburn with a far more comfortable lead. 
Blackburn’s campaign would not share the poll for publication. 
Abbi Sigler, a spokesperson for Blackburn’s campaign, snubs the poll, comparing it to the 2020 Senate primary between Sen. 
Bill Hagerty and Republican Manny Sethi. 
Chris Devaney, now Rose’s campaign manager, followed a similar cadence of releasing poll data while running Sethi’s campaign, which similarly predicted the primary would be within the margin of error. 
Ultimately, Hagerty won by 11.4 points. 
“More of the same tired playbook from the Rose campaign,” Sigler tells the Banner. 
“Their 2020 playbook failed then, and it will fail again now. 
This is a desperate attempt by political consultants to get their candidate to invest even more than the $10 million of his own money he's already poured in. 
Marsha Blackburn is going to be the Republican nominee and then the 51st Governor of the state of Tennessee." 
Devaney, Rose’s campaign manager, tells the Banner that the pendulum is swinging in Rose’s direction, comparing the race to Gov. 
Bill Lee’s primary win in 2018, which he also managed. 
“John Rose continues to have momentum," Devaney says. 
"Voters are looking for a CEO to lead the state, and are clearly rejecting a 34-year career politician as Sen. 
Blackburn’s numbers continue to plummet." 
Even with the apparently good news for Rose, Anderson notes that it’s too late for either candidate to move the needle much further. 
“The question becomes, 'is there enough runway left for Rose to actually close the gap? 
Is there enough of a runway for Blackburn to recover?'” 
Anderson says. 
“With a week left, I don’t have the answer to that.” 
Notably, both polls show Fritts in a similar position, suggesting the Christian nationalist state lawmaker had gained ground this summer as well. 
According to Anderson, much of Fritts’ support is among men under 30, the only notable demographic difference between the candidates. 
While the poll selected likely primary voters, young male voters are the least likely demographic to vote in either party’s primary. 
Political polling, particularly in a party primary, is an imperfect science and should be taken with a grain of salt. 
But regardless of whether Blackburn or Anderson’s poll is more accurate, the senior senator’s lead has certainly taken a hit this summer, with Fritts and Rose both gaining on her since the initial name recognition polling, which made her the presumed frontrunner and suggested pretty comfortable margins. 
Still, even in the most optimistic polling, Blackburn has always remained in the lead. 
Early voting is underway through Saturday. 
Primary Election Day is Aug. 
6. 
You can find more information about this and other races on the ballot in the Nashville Banner's voter guide. 
This article first appeared onNashville Banner and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.6%Sarah Grace Taylor: 3.2%Nashville Scene: 1.3%Confirmation Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 1.1%Nashville Scene: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Sarah Grace Taylor: 2.6%Nashville Scene: 2.2%Availability Heuristic10.6%This article: 13.2%Sarah Grace Taylor: 3.9%Nashville Scene: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic13.2%This article: 0.7%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.2%Nashville Scene: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.7%This article: 2.4%Sarah Grace Taylor: 2.5%Nashville Scene: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias2.4%This article: 6.2%Sarah Grace Taylor: 2.6%Nashville Scene: 3.6%Framing Effect6.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 3.0%Nashville Scene: 2.4%Optimism Bias7.0%This article: 0.5%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.1%Nashville Scene: 0.5%Pessimism Bias0.5%This article: 12.4%Sarah Grace Taylor: 4.2%Nashville Scene: 3.5%Negativity Bias12.4%This article: 7.1%Sarah Grace Taylor: 2.5%Nashville Scene: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias7.1%This article: 3.1%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.8%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error3.1%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 3.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%Sarah Grace Taylor: 5.0%Nashville Scene: 1.1%Recency Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Sarah Grace Taylor: 2.7%Nashville Scene: 0.8%Ad Hominem1.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 1.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.5%Sarah Grace Taylor: 1.7%Nashville Scene: 0.8%False Dilemma4.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.5%Sarah Grace Taylor: 4.7%Nashville Scene: 4.0%Hasty Generalization5.5%This article: 3.3%Sarah Grace Taylor: 2.5%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Red Herring3.3%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.8%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.1%Sarah Grace Taylor: 1.5%Nashville Scene: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion3.1%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 18.7%Sarah Grace Taylor: 6.4%Nashville Scene: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.7%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.1%Sarah Grace Taylor: 1.3%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.2%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.5%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Composition/Division2.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 1.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 1.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Middle Ground4.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 6.6%Sarah Grace Taylor: 2.2%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy6.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.1%Sarah Grace Taylor: 1.8%Nashville Scene: 7.4%Biased Writer Voice2.1%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Sarah Grace Taylor: 1.7%Nashville Scene: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.0%

916 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers23%attributed speech706writer words
Selected voice

Chris Devaney

100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words23% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%Chris Devaney: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%Chris Devaney: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.