Publication summary
⁠7%4 analyzed articles/videos7,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Injustice Watch results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,725 hits. Analysis detected 8,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,024 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (530 of 566 publications). This Injustice Watch is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Injustice Watch
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
⁠1%Montana Free Press1%
⁠1%Signal Cleveland1%
⁠1%BridgeDetroit1%
⁠1%The Trace1%
⁠7%Injustice Watch (selected)1%
⁠100%The White House9%
⁠100%Utah Hockey Club10%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

6% percentile
02550751006.4% percentile
0.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles28K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos