What can you tell us about these Cook County judges running for retention? 1%

By Injustice Watch Staff1%

6/2/2026, 12:36:20 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 1 faulty reasoning type, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 2.4% saturation with 12 hits. Analysis detected 12 faulty-reasoning hits from 494 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,640 of 28,846 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the article peer group.

Injustice Watch is researching Cook County judges who are running for retention in November 2026 for our judicial election guide . 
Circuit court judges serve 6-year and appellate court judges serve 10-year terms. 
At the end of their term, judges have to run for retention. 
Voters will be given the option to vote “yes” or “no” to keeping the judge in office. 
A judge must receive at least 60% yes votes to stay on the bench. 
There are 60 circuit court judges and one appellate court judge running for retention this year. 
Below are the names of the Cook County judges who have filed to run for retention in November, listed alphabetically (with their current assignment in parentheses). 
Have you had any of them as a judge in your case? 
Practiced in front of them as an attorney? 
Do you know them outside of the courtroom? 
Please let us know about your experience below. 
Your submission will be confidential. 
You can indicate if you’re open to further conversation with one of our reporters on or off the record. 
Do you have something to share about a judge who is not listed below? 
You can always send us a tip via email, phone, or mail. 
Find out how  
Julie B. 
Aimen (Domestic Relations) 
John M. 
Allegretti (1st Municipal) 
Erin Haggerty Antonietti (6th District) 
Edward A. 
Arce (Domestic Relations) 
Laura Ayala-Gonzalez (Criminal) 
Andrea M. 
Buford (Child Protection) 
Krista D. 
Butler (1st Municipal Eviction) 
Thomas J. 
Byrne (Criminal) 
Thomas J. 
Carroll (6th District) 
Patrick K. 
Coughlin (6th District) 
Thomas M. 
Cushing (Law) 
Maire Aileen Dempsey (Law) 
Sondra Nicole Denmark (1st Municipal Trials) 
Jamie G. 
Dickler (Probate) 
Patricia M. 
Fallon (Domestic Relations) 
Michael A. 
Forti (Domestic Relations) 
Megan E. 
Goldish (Domestic Violence) 
Jonathan Green (Law) 
Anjana M.J. 
Hansen (2nd District) 
Sheree D. 
Henry (4th District) 
Kerry M. 
Kennedy (5th District) 
Diana L. 
Kenworthy (Criminal) 
Robert D. 
Kuzas (1st Municipal Misdemeanor) 
Anthony C. 
Kyriakopoulos (Chancery) 
John J. 
Mahoney III (5th District) 
Daniel E. 
Maloney (6th District) 
Maritza Martinez (Domestic Relations) 
Mary C. 
Marubio (2nd District) 
Celestia L. 
Mays (4th District) 
Terrence J. 
McGuire (Probate) 
Maura McMahon Zeller (Domestic Relations) 
Regina A. 
Mescall (Domestic Relations) 
Bridget A. 
Mitchell (Law) 
Teresa Molina-Gonzalez (4th District) 
Caroline Kate Moreland (Chancery) 
John G. 
Mulroe (Juvenile Justice) 
Lorraine Murphy (2nd District) 
Lewis Michael Nixon (Chancery) 
Eileen M. 
O’Connor (Law) 
Nichole C. 
Patton (Law) 
James Paul Pieczonka (3rd District) 
Joan E. 
Powell (Law) 
Jill Rose Quinn (Domestic Relations) 
Pamela Reaves-Harris (1st Municipal Housing) 
Judith C. 
Rice (Domestic Violence) 
Kristal Royce Rivers (5th District) 
Abbey Fishman Romanek (Domestic Relations) 
Kristyna C. 
Ryan (4th District) 
Patricia O’Brien Sheahan (Law) 
Levander Smith Jr. 
(Child Protection) 
Tiesha L. 
Smith (Juvenile Justice) 
Chris Stacey (1st Municipal) 
Perla Tirado (1st Municipal) 
Gerardo Tristan Jr. (1st Municipal) 
Ursula Walowski (Criminal) 
Elizabeth A. 
Walsh (Law) 
Tyria B. 
Walton (Criminal) 
Maureen Ward Kirby (County) 
Steven Gregory Watkins (Criminal) 
Lynn Weaver-Boyle (Chancery) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 1.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 1.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 2.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 6.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 1.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 1.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 2.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 1.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.0%Injustice Watch: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Injustice Watch Staff: 0.6%Injustice Watch: 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.4%

494 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker4.3%attributed speech473writer words
Selected voice

Injustice Watch

0%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words100% of attributed speech2.5% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Injustice Watch: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.