Author summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 2,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pascal Sabino results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Pessimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 475 hits . Analysis detected 3,914 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,273 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,725 of 6,628 authors). This Pascal Sabino is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Pascal Sabino
Author details
Total words: 6,273
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst