Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ["wimbledon" results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 822 hits . Analysis detected 3,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (24,608 of 37,536 keywords). This ["wimbledon" is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. ["wimbledon"
Keyword details
Total words: 4,828
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CBC 49% 7/24/2026, 9:48:54 AM