Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tumaini Carayol results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Recency Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,034 hits . Analysis detected 9,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,463 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Tumaini Carayol is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Tumaini Carayol
Author details
Total words: 11,463
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst