Keyword summary
30% 10 analyzed articles/videos 9,522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Planning results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 4,008 hits . Analysis detected 36,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 48,256 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,768 of 37,536 keywords). This Urban Planning is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Urban Planning
Keyword details
Total words: 48,256
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score10 analyzed articles48.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst