Author summary
42% 1 analyzed article/video 981 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbara Thimm results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and False Dilemma , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 795 hits . Analysis detected 3,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,527 of 6,561 authors). This Barbara Thimm is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Barbara Thimm
Author details
Total words: 3,924
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.1% 7.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.6% 9.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst