Keyword summary
18% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,221 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Upper West Side results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 742 hits . Analysis detected 6,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,522 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (32,894 of 36,599 keywords). This Upper West Side is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Upper West Side
Keyword details
Total words: 10,522
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst