2 dead, 3 critically injured by out-of-control car driver, 61, on Upper West Side 64%

By Kerry Burke34% Colin Mixson63%

5/15/2026, 11:45:44 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 717 faulty-reasoning hits from 281 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.9% and a BS Rank of 64% (7,622 of 21,170 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the article peer group.

Two people died and three were critically injured after a 61-year-old driver plowed his Mercedes-Benz into a crowd of pedestrians on Manhattan’s Upper West Side Friday, cops said. 
The driver was heading north on Amsterdam Ave. in his black GLC 300 SUV when he lost control near W. 109th St. around 6 p.m., according to law enforcement. 
The Mercedes slammed into a silver Volkswagen Jetta, careened into a bronze Chevy Astro and then mounted the sidewalk, according to witnesses. 
A nearby resident watched from her window overlooking the scene as the horror unfolded. 
“There were two men lying on the ground. 
Another man was giving one of them CPR. 
Someone was screaming, ‘We need an ambulance! 
Where are the ambulances?'” 
Jaime Cunningham, 49, told the Daily News. 
“It was awful,” she added. 
“The black car, the Mercedes, was going fast.” 
A woman dining at a nearby restaurant said the driver slammed into a cyclist before mounting the sidewalk. 
“It was a loud impact,” said Marilyn Williams. 
“My husband ran over and he came back pretty upset. 
He said there was one person trapped beneath the black car and there was a young cyclist who was riding in the bike lane who was hit and thrown onto the sidewalk.” 
“Some local people were trying to give him CPR, but it didn’t seem to be working.” 
Medics rushed five injured pedestrians, all men, to local hospitals in critical condition, where two of them died, police said. 
The driver remained at the scene. 
Police are investigating whether he was intoxicated, according to multiple law enforcement sources. 
There were no arrests. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 2.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Kerry Burke: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias4.6%This article: 22.1%Kerry Burke: 4.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.3%Availability Heuristic22.1%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 21.7%Kerry Burke: 5.6%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect21.7%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.4%Kerry Burke: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Kerry Burke: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 39.1%Kerry Burke: 10.1%newyorkdailynews: 9.7%Negativity Bias39.1%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 4.1%newyorkdailynews: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Kerry Burke: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect5.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 48.8%Kerry Burke: 3.6%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority48.8%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 3.1%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.2%Kerry Burke: 9.1%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion14.2%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 2.2%newyorkdailynews: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.6%Kerry Burke: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof4.6%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 39.9%Kerry Burke: 4.0%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal39.9%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.7%Kerry Burke: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 16.0%Kerry Burke: 2.9%newyorkdailynews: 2.2%Unattributed Quote16.0%This article: 6.8%Kerry Burke: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection6.8%This article: 19.6%Kerry Burke: 4.6%newyorkdailynews: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice19.6%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

281 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers31%attributed speech195writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageJaime Cunningham • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJaime Cunningham • 5 words • 100.0% coverageJaime Cunningham • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageMarilyn Williams • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMarilyn Williams • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMarilyn Williams • 32 words • 0.0% coverageMarilyn Williams • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marilyn Williams

100%flagged-word coverage
66 attributed words77% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-25.6 ptsWriter: 25.6%Marilyn Williams: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-23.1 ptsWriter: 23.1%Marilyn Williams: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-9.7 ptsWriter: 9.7%Marilyn Williams: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.