Keyword summary
85% 6 analyzed articles/videos 7,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United Farm Workers results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 3,529 hits . Analysis detected 29,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,376 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,962 of 37,536 keywords). This United Farm Workers is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group. United Farm Workers
Keyword details
Total words: 28,376
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles28.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst