Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ufos results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 3,049 hits . Analysis detected 23,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,208 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,445 of 37,533 keywords). This Ufos is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group. Ufos
Keyword details
Total words: 21,208
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst