Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Doocy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 871 hits . Analysis detected 5,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,355 of 6,359 authors). This Peter Doocy is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. Peter Doocy
Author details
Total words: 3,840
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.7% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 22.7% 22.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 10.6% 10.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 12.1% 12.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.6% 6.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 22.7%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst