KUOW73%

'Disclosure Day' isn't as out-of-this-world as its premise 41%

By Dyer Oxley0%

6/12/2026, 11:34:39 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 1,927 faulty-reasoning hits from 863 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (13,024 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the article peer group.

Despite real-world hype, Steven Spielberg's "Disclosure Day" doesn't quite reach out-of-this-world movie fun. 
When people make top five lists of Steven Spielberg alien flicks, including "E.T.," "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," even "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull," "Disclosure Day" will likely be listed at the bottom, if it makes the cut at all. 
Amid a zeitgeist of government UFO disclosures, Spielberg returns to the alien genre with a story fit for the times. 
"Disclosure Day," however, doesn't quite live up to his now classic films that have become cultural touchstones. 
RELATED: 'Disclosure Day' star Josh O'Connor received a 'genius' late-night text from Spielberg 
Margaret (Emily Blunt) is career-driven TV meteorologist and she's on her way up the media ladder at her local Kansas City TV news station. 
But that plan is put on the backburner when she suddenly starts speaking foreign languages, including some odd clicks and grunts. 
While many assume she is having a medical emergency, it alerts nefarious figures who are now chasing her. 
Elsewhere, Dr. 
Kellner (Josh O'Connor) is on the run from those same nefarious figures, including the mysterious Noah (Colin Firth). 
He's on a mission to tell the truth to the world. 
But that mission isn't so easy. 
It will involve covert action and spy level intrigue. 
Perhaps together, they can disclose what they know to the world. 
While "Disclosure Day" has aliens at its core, the film isn't really about aliens. 
It's about humans and whether our species is mature enough to receive revolutionary information about the universe. 
It measures our belief systems, religious traditions, and our moral compasses against such a shocking revelation. 
If aliens truly are real, could humans handle it? 
Would we go nuts, go religious, go defensive, or perhaps grow up? 
You can expect action and thrills, but don't expect aliens to be running alongside Margaret and Kellner. 
As such, "Disclosure Day" is very much like 1997's "Contact" where, despite the what the name implies, contact with aliens is far from the purpose of the film. 
Instead, "Contact" is heavy on contrasting science with religion and humanity's journey to become a greater species, to evolve past petty Earthly conflicts. 
"Disclosure Day" is all of that (right down to the contrast of aliens and religion), heightened with some espionage, thrills, and a dash of action. 
And just as "Contact" was about the work toward making contact, "Disclosure Day" is more about the adventure en route to disclosure day. 
That's largely where "Disclosure Day" falls apart. 
It relies on action sequences to grab your attention  car chases, shoot-outs, making great leaps over dangerous gaps, all while drawing out these scenes far longer than they need be. 
This is thickly layered over the premise of revealing alien truth. 
It brings a movie with an out-of-this-world theme down to a generic, even cliché, level. 
It ends up being the kind of movie where people trip while running, or jump to a ledge only to barely catch the edge and struggle to climb to safety  probably while somebody is shooting at you, because why not? 
Spielberg has promoted "Disclosure Day" as being "less about what I could imagine and much more about what other people have actually witnessed and experienced in the world, in different countries, in terms of eye witnessing UFOs, now being called UAPs." 
But the movie is still very much rooted in fiction. 
It merely plays off the real-world zeitgeist, with the U.S. government releasing decades of UFO files. 
But it loses touch with any reality around this news. 
For example, Spielberg incorporates the idea of crop circles, a phenomenon / hoax that has long been debunked. 
But it is presented in "Disclosure Day" as a genuine aspect of alien activity on Earth. 
It also comes shortly after the documentary "The Age of Disclosure" created considerable buzz in 2025. 
That documentary was all about presenting government officials and others with credentials to talk about the truth "they" don't want you to know about  the secrets agencies are keeping, the alien technology that is covertly being studied. 
"Disclosure Day" feeds off that level of conspiracy theory that has been present in American pop culture since the 1940s. 
Spielberg was partially inspired to make this movie after reading a 2017 New York Times report "Glowing Auras and 'Black Money': The Pentagon's mysterious U.F.O. program." 
Those headlines keep coming. 
RELATED: UFO files spanning decades are released by Defense Department 
RELATED: How UFO Sightings Went From Conspiracy Theory To A Serious Government Inquiry 
But this movie only plays in this paranoid genre and is more interested in the fictional aspects of UFOs and aliens among pop culture. 
Despite that dive into alien fiction, "Disclosure Day" carries a vibe of "Whoa, can you believe it! 
Aliens, man! 
This stuff is wild." 
While that might have worked well in previous Spielberg alien flicks, such as "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," it doesn't work as well in an age of real government disclosure of UFO investigations. 
Disclosure Day 
2/5 stars 
Screen or stream? 
Stream. 
You can wait to stream this one at home. 
Rated PG-13 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.1%Dyer Oxley: 3.3%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias14.1%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 2.2%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Dyer Oxley: 3.8%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic5.7%This article: 8.5%Dyer Oxley: 1.6%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic8.5%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 1.1%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 2.4%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.1%Dyer Oxley: 5.3%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect14.1%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.7%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.8%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 5.1%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Dyer Oxley: 1.3%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 37.4%Dyer Oxley: 8.8%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias37.4%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 1.8%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.6%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 2.6%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.3%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Dyer Oxley: 3.6%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect6.4%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.8%Dyer Oxley: 1.8%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.3%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.2%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.2%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.8%Dyer Oxley: 4.3%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority9.8%This article: 5.3%Dyer Oxley: 1.2%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma5.3%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.4%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.2%Dyer Oxley: 0.3%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning3.2%This article: 13.9%Dyer Oxley: 7.5%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization13.9%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.4%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.2%Dyer Oxley: 1.4%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon5.2%This article: 5.1%Dyer Oxley: 5.6%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion5.1%This article: 1.2%Dyer Oxley: 1.0%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question1.2%This article: 14.4%Dyer Oxley: 2.5%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.4%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.3%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof1.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.4%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.6%Dyer Oxley: 2.1%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal12.6%This article: 4.4%Dyer Oxley: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman4.4%This article: 6.3%Dyer Oxley: 1.6%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.3%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.3%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.4%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.8%Dyer Oxley: 1.5%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote4.8%This article: 4.8%Dyer Oxley: 0.6%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection4.8%This article: 15.9%Dyer Oxley: 6.3%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice15.9%This article: 7.2%Dyer Oxley: 1.5%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination7.2%This article: 2.3%Dyer Oxley: 0.1%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Dyer Oxley: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Dyer Oxley: 2.5%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.2%

863 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker4.8%attributed speech822writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Spielberg • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Steven Spielberg

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words100% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Steven Spielberg: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Steven Spielberg: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+88.3 ptsWriter: 11.7%Steven Spielberg: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-7.5 ptsWriter: 7.5%Steven Spielberg: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Steven Spielberg: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-2.4 ptsWriter: 2.4%Steven Spielberg: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.