Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,976 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Spielberg results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 5,304 hits . Analysis detected 28,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,836 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,636 of 37,536 keywords). This Steven Spielberg is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group. Steven Spielberg
Keyword details
Total words: 27,836
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles27.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst