Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alfie Packham results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 886 hits . Analysis detected 9,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,816 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,759 of 6,170 authors). This Alfie Packham is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Alfie Packham
Author details
Total words: 12,816
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst