Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Kearse results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 1,518 hits . Analysis detected 4,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,713 of 6,628 authors). This Stephen Kearse is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Stephen Kearse
Author details
Total words: 4,628
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.2% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 32.8% 32.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.1% 27.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.6% 12.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 27.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst