Keyword summary
45% 39 analyzed articles/videos 32,627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.s. Immigration And Customs Enforcement results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 11,567 hits . Analysis detected 100,772 faulty-reasoning hits from 132,269 analyzed words across 39 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (32,470 of 34,692 keywords). This U.s. Immigration And Customs Enforcement is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. U.s. Immigration And Customs Enforcement
Keyword details
Total words: 132,269
Article count: 39
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score39 analyzed articles132.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst