Keyword summary
84% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle City Council results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 2,366 hits . Analysis detected 12,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,830 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (26,865 of 35,718 keywords). This Seattle City Council is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Seattle City Council
Keyword details
Total words: 13,830
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst